Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Categories

    13 July 2009

    Remember three years ago, and how all the GOP senators could say was that they wanted an up or down vote on SCOTUS nominees?

    Yeah, well that was then and this is now.  Republicans, in an almost humorous twist of irony, are proclaiming Sonia Sotomayor is a racist.  Isn't that right, Rush?

    It will be an interesting show.  As Joe at AmericaBlog notes...

    ...[K]eep your eyes on Senator Jefferson Beauregard Sessions (R-AL). He's the ranking Republican on the Judiciary committee and is leading the charge against Sotomayor. In 1986, Sessions own nomination to become a federal judge was defeated (in a Republican-led Senate) because he was accused of being a racist. Let's just say, the leopard hasn't changed its spots. The Jefferson of 1986 is the Jefferson of 2009. He can't help himself. The nomination of a Latina to the Supreme Court could put him over the edge.

    It says a lot about the current state of the GOP that Sessions is the leader of the anti-Sotomayor effort. (It's really not too hard to imagine Sessions in the uniform of a Confederate officer.) In some ways, the hearings will show us more about Sessions and the GOP than Sotomayor.


    Meanwhile, CBS Radio News White House reporter Mark Knoller is now tweeting the hearings, but not before pimping a new CBS News poll that shows 62% of Americans are undecided on Sotomayor.  No shit?  You mean each and every one of us hasn't thoroughly researched the nominee and come to a reasoned conclusion, Mark?  Wow.  Who knew. 

    In any case, I expect Sessions and other Republicans to more or less give Sotomayor a hearty helping of their best character assassination and baseless harassment.  Go ahead, dimwits; chase away whatever remaining Hispanics  consider your party a viable alternative.  Be true to your xenophobic selves.

    Oh, yeah, and keep in mind:  Empathy is a dirty, awful liberal thing.  Feeling empathy, like drawing on your personal life experience, is so anti-American. 

    10 July 2009

    A few words of caution regarding your health and well-being before you visit Chico's Taco's in El Paso, especially if you happen to be gay

    First, the place apparently needs guards... plural.  One security guard must not be enough to protect the honor and integrity of the Chico's dining experience.

    Second, don't be a gay couple who gives one another a quick peck on the lips, because the guards don't allow "that faggot stuff" in their fine establishment.

    Two men were summarily ejected, along with three friends for showing some monogamous affection, according to the El Paso Times...

    Two gay men kissed at a Chico's Tacos restaurant, prompting guards to eject them and a police officer to endorse their ouster.

    Civil-rights lawyers say the security staff was out of line. Police, though, contend that a business such as a restaurant can refuse service to anybody, any time.

    In all, five men were ordered to leave the restaurant. They say they were forced out by homophobic guards.

    "It was a simple kiss on the lips," said Carlos Diaz de Leon, a gay man who was part of the group.

    He called police at 12:30 a.m. June 29 because he said the guards and restaurant had discriminated against the group after two of his friends kissed in public.

    The police were apparently not too gay-friendly either...

    "I went up to the police officer to tell him what was going on, and he didn't want to hear my side," de Leon said. "He wanted to hear the security guard's side first."

    Police declined to identify the officers who responded, but department spokesman Javier Sambrano described one officer as relatively inexperienced.

    De Leon said the officer told the group it was illegal for two men or two women to kiss in public. The five men, he said, were told they could be cited for homosexual conduct -- a law the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional in 2003 in Lawrence v. Texas.

    That same year, the El Paso City Council approved an ordinance banning discrimination based on sexual orientation by businesses open to the public.

    I wonder if one of the officers was heard to utter something like, "Laws?  We don't need no stinkin' laws!"  Hopefully not, but you'd think the police force would have some idea what the law is... or at least have the common sense to ask someone who does.  The chief might want to rethink that training program.

    When asked by a reporter from KVIA-TV for a comment, owner Bernie Mora said. "We are here to sell tacos, not to offend anyone."

    Bernie, say hello to Senior FAIL.

    They sure aren't much for the gays down there in Texas, the state with the governor who thinks succession from the United States is an option.  Just last month, Fort Worth police did some serious gay bashing at a local bar, well timed to happen during gay pride week. Coincidence?  One wonders.

    What I really want to know, though, is why would any self-respecting gay couple go to a dump like Chico's anyway?  Here's a sample of not-so-favorable reviews from Yelp (pre-homophobic "event")...

    In a word, Chico's sucks.

    El Paso is full of great Mexican restaurants and Chico's is definitely not one of them. Somehow it has become a local legend that if you are true homeboy you are supposed -- required -- to love Chico's, but don't fall for it.  There are a hundred better Mexican restaurants in El Paso.

    :::

    I think any place I have to eat at in the presence of rent-a-cops should be questionable. The women violate health regulations with the fake nails, huge earrings, and lack of hair nets, or something to pull their hair back. The tacos look like a welfare concoction of tex-mex. This is not mexican food but rather tex-mex. The only thing I can tolerate eating there is the grilled cheese. I try to avoid this place.

    :::

    What is the big deal with Chico's Tacos?  I grew up in El Paso - went to HS just down the street and if I could I would give them negative one star.  It's a gooey mess of greasy rolled tacos, supposedly beef,  with mounds of cheese and a soupy tomato mixture.  What gets me is these people who order extra tomato sauce ... some die hards will even drink it! Ewh!

    Yum!  One stop shopping for homophobia, health code violations AND diarrhea!  Can't wait for my next trip to El Paso... which will be a few days after never.

    09 July 2009

    Another PR lesson for United Airlines: Your lousy customer service and surly employees might get you a popular YouTube music video

    United Airlines is one of many so-called legacy air carriers that have hit the skids.  In my estimation, they have fallen the farthest.  I personally avoid them -- and their Chicago O'Hare hub -- at all costs.

    Musician Dave Carroll spent nine months wishing he had steered clear of United's unfriendly skies.  The airline's baggage handlers trashed his guitar as he watched from his seat on the plane.  He then had what can only be described as a complete customer service cluster-fuck. 

    Carroll, being a musician and all, decided to apply his creative talents to the problem.  He came up with this:

    As of this writing, the video has had 641,937 views and 10,867 people have given it an average rating of five stars.  5,610 people have left comments... few of them very favorable to United.

    To really appreciate the song, take a look at Carroll's website.  He posted the whole sad story and to read it is to know he really did get screwed by United.  No surprise there.  But only when he got past being mad and got creative instead did United finally wise up.  Funny what a viral video can do.  As is often the case, once this thing took off, the mainstream media picked it up. The LA Times put the video on their site.  Yesterday he was interviewed on CNN's The Situation Room, and a part of the video was shown.

    Paging Dave Carroll to the white courtesy phone.  United Airlines has a call for you!  And what d'ya know... they are suddenly in a mood to make things better.

    "It struck a chord with us,” said Robin Urbanski, a spokeswoman with United Airlines.

    Yeah.  I'll bet it did.  Especially with Wolf Blitzer playing the video. 

    "We are in conversations with (Carroll) to make what happened right and, while we mutually agree this should have been fixed much sooner, his video is excellent.

    “It provides us with a learning opportunity we can use for training purposes.”

    She said they hope to provide customers with better service.

    I think it is safe to say that until this turned into a very unflattering PR problem, United was no-way, no-how going to do anything for this man.  They practiced the fine art of the customer service run-around, which can be quite effective in getting people to just give up.  It's kind of an extended way of telling the customer:  "You aren't important to us, and we know we can ignore you, so just fuck off, won't you?"

    And to think United was once what many people considered the best airline flying.  Now they make Air Uzbekistan look pretty good.

    07 July 2009

    "They give us those nice bright colors. They give us the greens of summers. Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh yeah"

    Kodachrome-film-460x367 "What is Kodachrome?"

    That would be my response on Jeopardy if the answer offered was, "The absolute best film to capture anything in true color and preserve it for all time."

    Kodachrome_Old My first real job was as a clerk at a camera store when I was 15.  I was already a camera nerd, developing and printing my own black and white film.  I messed around with slide film... usually Kodak's Ektachrome, because I had always heard it was more stable even though it had a sort of bluish bias.  But I also knew that, without exception, the best color saturation... provided you had a lot of light... was Kodachrome... especially Kodachrome 25.

     Even back then, in the 1970s, Kodachrome was special, in a class by itself.  It couldn;t be processed by just anyone.  Our little store shipped it from San Diego up to Kodak's lab in Palo Alto.  (I still have the yellow Kodak Palo Alto transfer bag I appropriated when I worked at RB Photo.) It took longer, but the results - even for an amateur - were worth the time and expense.

    As recently as ten years ago, the instructors at The Nikon School, a traveling seminar for serious amateurs, talked about the value of shooting transparency film over print film, and that nothing delivered like Kodachrome.  The images perfectly captured a full range of color in the most stable of forms.

    Kcromecamera But Kodachrome's time was limited.  Digital photography was pretty much bringing a close to the multi-century history of capturing images on film. The ability to capture, manipulate, and print professional grade color was brought to the home market by camera makers along with manufacturers of digital hardware on flash memory media.  To be shooting with film was to be protecting the buggy whip franchise.  My Nikon N70 and N90 are now up on the shelf with my antique camera collection.  The D70 took over, and now I lust after the D90 and others.

    Last month, Kodak announced that the last product in the Kodachrome line, Kodachrome 64, would no longer be manufactured.  Most camera nerds and professional photographers are accepting this as the inevitable, but it is still kind of sad.

    Some are taking it better than others...

    Jim Sugar, a Mill Valley advertising and commercial photographer, said it was about time.

    "The world became a different place when the resolving power of digital cameras equaled or surpassed film," he said. "This was not a tragedy. This was a train wreck that we saw coming for 15 years. And by this point it wasn't even a train wreck, it was a fender bender."

    But some fans are not ready to let go just yet.

    John Game, a 62-year-old amateur botanical photographer in Berkeley, has used Kodachrome for more than 30 years because, in his view, nothing else would do.

    Game still has eight Kodachrome rolls to go and is looking for more. He plans to use them as he tries to "gradually wean myself off of them."

    "For my last roll I'll make a point of doing something symbolic, something special with it," he said. "It's been a wonderful film. It's like the end of an era in photography."  [San Francisco Chronicle]


    Like everyone else reflecting on this passing of this artistic icon, I keep thinking of Paul Simon's song, and only now can truly appreciate and feel the sentiment in those closing lyrics.

    "Mama don't take my Kodachrome away."

    Too late.

    06 July 2009

    It's true that dissent is patriotic. But try to have some clue as to what you are dissenting over! At least study the talking points...

    The Fourth of July Tea Party circuit was pretty much a bust.  Sparse crowds. Uninspired yelling.  White supremacist recruiting.  All in all, not nearly as powerful as the April 15th FOX News ratings promotion.

    At least the folks that gathered in Times Square to hear the wisdom of Stephen Baldwin were an informed group.  Well, actually, not so much on the "informed" thing.  But they were certainly entertaining...

    Teabagging FAIL.

    [h/t Oliver Willis]

    04 July 2009

    Some perspective from true patriots before the term was co-opted by poseurs

    Declaration_big_enhanced The American Experiment. That's what it's been called. During a hot, humid Philadelphia summer, a group of men risked their lives to pull together a statement of independence for the world to see.

    When I was in junior high school I saw the musical 1776. That's when I first became so fascinated with the story of the Declaration of Independence and the contributions of great men like Adams, Jefferson, Franklin, Rutledge and Dickenson.

    This song, delivered by John Adams (William Daniels) captured the urgency of the moment back then. I still know all the words to that musical, and this remains my favorite part. (Yeah, make your gay-guy/show tunes jokes! I care not.)

    People argue back and forth across political ideologies about what it means to be a "true" American.  The men who crafted, debated and then affirmed this document... true Americans. 

    IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
    The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

    When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

    He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

    He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

    He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

    He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

    He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

    He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

    He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

    He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

    He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

    He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

    He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

    He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

    He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

    For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

    For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

    For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

    For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

    For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

    For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

    For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

    For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

    For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

    He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

    He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

    He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

    He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

    He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

    In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

    Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

    We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

    John Hancock

    New Hampshire:
    Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

    Massachusetts:
    John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

    Rhode Island:
    Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

    Connecticut:
    Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

    New York:
    William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

    New Jersey:
    Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

    Pennsylvania:
    Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

    Delaware:
    Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

    Maryland:
    Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

    Virginia:
    George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

    North Carolina:
    William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

    South Carolina:
    Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

    Georgia:
    Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

    03 July 2009

    That Tina Fey is hilarious! Her "I'm quitting my job 'cause you media people are mean to me" thing on TV today was too perfect

    I love that Tina went and did a Palin skit for daytime TV.

    Wait, what?

    This isn't Tina Fey?  Oh, come on; sure it is.  I mean, you don't just quit being a governor because of friction from the press.  Not if your a tough Alaskan bush woman who field dresses your own moose you shot with an assault rifle from a chopper, anyway.  Hell, Mark Sanford was boinking some lady from Argentina on South Carolina's dime and got totally exposed over it... and he's not quitting his job as governor.  Blago didn't quit... he waited for the indictments and impeachment.

    Oh, Tina, umm, Sarah, say it ain't so.

    So it really is her, too, yes.  Well, I'll be damned.  Didn't see this coming.  But I guess being a quitter is something she perfected in all those attempts at those four colleges she attended.

    Her statement was one long winding ride through crazyville.  Wow.  And to think this lunatic could have been vice president.  Scary shit. Also.

    01 July 2009

    Apparently, PETA was nowhere to be found when this crime against a sweet little kitty-cat was being committed

    Wetcat What the f*** was this cat's owner thinking?

    For those people unclear on the concept, cat's do NOT like water.  By extension, cats do not like it when you try to bathe them.  So don't.  No matter what the damn thing rolls in.

    Fabreeze, perhaps?

    [h/t Wicked Gay Blog]

    The first thing I thought of when Al Franken was (finally) named the winner of the senate seat in Minnesota: I hope there's video of Bill O'Reilly's head exploding!

    Oreillymada30efbns9 Honestly, it's the first thing I thought of.  Unfortunately, Billo the Clown was taking the day off.  Maybe he's in seclusion.  Maybe he's out getting drunk.  Maybe he was realizing that he doesn't shape the world after all.

    I like Bill in Portland Maine's take from DK this morning...

    Hi, Bill. It's me...Bill.

    I've been waiting for this day so that I could say something special to you.

    You see, Bill, I remember exactly where I was when I heard you declare on your radio show, shortly after Election Day 2008, that "that guttersnipe" Al Franken would "never" set foot inside the United States Senate.

    It wasn't a toss-away line. You were emphatic. You called Al Franken a guttersnipe and swore he'd never become a United States Senator. Do you remember that, Bill? I do. I was in the car with my partner driving down Falmouth Street in Portland. As we turned the corner onto Oakdale Street, you made your bitter, non-negotiable declaration. I seared that moment into my brain, Bill. And here we are, at the intersection of Psychic Friends Network Avenue and Reality Boulevard.

    This morning I want to tell you something, Bill O'Reilly. Come closer... Closer... Cloooooser...

    Okay, man, that's close enough.

    Now, with my lips a quarter-inch from your---whoo---abnormally-waxy ear canal, I can finally whisper the words I've waited nearly eight months to say:

    "Game over, Bill. You lose. And not just another battle with Al. This time you lost the war."

    I couldn't have said it better myself.  Now excuse me while I laugh my ass off before I get back to that thesis thing.

    29 June 2009

    Newspapers even lose on their websites: "time spent" measures show drop

    From The Business Insider's Silicon Alley Insider's Chart of the Day comes this chart of the day:

    Saichart062909
    Sadly, even the new media part of old media is losing out to digital-only and other alternative news outlets.  No stickiness means limited engagement, which in turn means it's hard to charge advertisers much for web ads.

    How 'green' is your product when it has to be shipped hundreds and hundreds of miles? Stoneyfield Farm's environmental claims seem to be at odds with it's own marketing strategy

    I like Stonyfield Farm yogurt. It's much better than the mass-market stuff like Yoplait and Dannon, let alone store-brand wannabees.  No fake stuff, no high-fructose corn syrup.  No mystery fruit.  Even more so, I like that the company seems to take a very serious approach to environmental issues.

    From their website...

    Stonyfield4 We got our start as an organic farming school, which means we’ve been caring for the planet for longer than we’ve been making yogurt. Today, our organic ingredient purchases help to keep over 100,000 farm acres free of toxic, persistent pesticides and chemical fertilizers known to contaminate soil, rivers, and drinking water.

    To help reduce global warming, we offset all of the C02 emissions from our facility energy use. We also started a nonprofit called “Climate Counts” which shows people how they can help fight climate change by the way they shop and invest.

    With a solar array on the roof of our Yogurt Works, we generate some of the clean renewable energy we use to make our yogurt. Through reuse and recycling, we prevent hundreds of tons of waste from reaching landfills and incinerators each year. And we give 10% of our profits to efforts that help protect and restore the earth.

    They so strongly profess a love of green corporate citizenship that the company CEO wrote a book about it. 

    Here's the thing, though:  They talk about CO2 offsets and how they work to help people fight climate change by the way they shop.  Well, Stonyfield is located in New Hampshire, which is about 1100 miles from where I live near Madison.  Meanwhile, there are local dairies here in Wisconsin (perhaps you've heard that we are America's Dairy-land).  If I follow Stonyfiled's logic and instruction, I should be buying locally produced products, or at least those products that come the shortest distance.  Stonyfield's whole approach to green marketing suggests that I not buy their products.

    Cfre So I stopped buying Stonyfield yogurt. 

    But, to be totally honest, I didn't actually drop them for green reasons.  Now I buy Cascade Fresh yogurt, which is also all-natural and is actually even better than Stonyfield.  It does come from Washington, so it takes almost twice the energy resources in terms of fuel to get here.  But it is sooo good, not to mention being about 70% the cost of Stonyfield.  And unlike Stonyfield, which is part of global conglomerate Groupe Danone, Cascade Fresh is an independent company that seems to take a more honest marketing position.

    Did I mention I drive a hybrid car?  That's my offset for buying products that come with excessive energy costs for my satisfaction.  Uh huh.  About as sincere as Stonyfield.

    27 June 2009

    Romeo and Juliet stand into the prevailing southwest wind

    Water tower at Frank Lloyd Wright's Taliesin, Spring Green, Wisconsinphoto.jpg posted remotely via iPhone

    26 June 2009

    Of Republicans, family values and moral terpitude: What will it take for the so-called religious right to figure out they have been played for fools?

    There's a great op-ed by journalism professor Walter Brasch over at The Public Record that is well worth the read.  Let me recommend it by cutting to it's summation:

    Republican leaders aren’t the only ones who commit adultery, nor are conservatives or members of the Religious Right, including preachers, solely the ones to have violated the seventh and tenth Commandments. But, it is the "family values" Republican leaders, who have led the party of right wing moral indignation; it is the Religious Right that has overtaken the party and wears the now-tarnished shield of righteousness to protect itself against anyone who doesn't share their own views of the world, including moderate and liberal Republicans, and anyone belonging to another political party.

    The hypocrisy and moral turpitude of the leaders is just one reason why only 21 percent of Americans identify themselves as Republicans.

    The piece offers an extraordinary roster of indiscretions, moral lapses, and other failing that are the exact same kind as those railed against by holier-than-thou conservatives and Republicans.  So very curious that so many of these people are so overheated about what other people do that may be contradictory to what their god supposedly tells them or to their obscure interpretations of a famous historical novel.

    This may not prove much one way or the other... except that the honest, everyday conservative Christians sure have been suckered in by a Republican party that sees them as nothing more than patsies that raise cash and deliver votes.

    [h/t Steve Singiser]

    By the way...

    The Public Record is a nonprofit investigative news magazine featuring exclusive, original reporting covering a wide-range of domestic and international issues. [They] are dedicated to holding elected officials and corporations accountable and promoting greater access to information in order to build a more transparent democracy.

    It really says something when the Chinese government objects to the takeover of Hummer by a Chinese company for environmental reasons

    Hummer I've always thought Hummers were a prime example of what happens when the confluence of American consumerism and testosterone imbalance goes horribly wrong.  Aside from being proof that money can't buy taste, the damn things are emblematic of many Americans' complete disregard of our own energy situation, ignorance of global warming, and Detroit's too-cozy-for-too-long relationship with Big Oil.

    To prove how bad these things are for the environment, China (China who is our rival for pollution and energy consumption) is moving to block the acquisition of the Hummer brand by a Chinese company.

    [BBC] A Chinese firm's bid to buy the gas-guzzling Hummer car brand will be blocked on environmental grounds, according to Chinese state radio.

    Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery emerged as the surprise buyer for the brand earlier this year.  But China National Radio said Hummer is at odds with the country's planning agency's attempts to decrease pollution from Chinese manufacturers.

    But Sichuan Tengzhong disputed the accuracy of the radio report.  "The fact that it is from an article from a state media organization does not mean it is government policy," the company said in a statement.  "Some people may have views and speculation, but the Chinese government has a process that we respect."

    The acquisition from General Motors needs Chinese regulatory approval.

    One more reason for people who drive these things to be proud:  the Chinese are rejecting them.


    25 June 2009

    Burger King seems to be selling something more than just mediocre fast food these days

    I would love to have been in the meeting when this transit poster was sold to the BK client:

    BK blows

    The copy doesn't disappoint either...

    Fill your desire for something long, juicy and flame-grilled with the NEW BK SUPER SEVEN INCHER. Yearn for more after you taste the mind-blowing burger that comes with a single beef patty, topped with American cheese, crispy onions and the A1 Thick and Hearty Steak Sauce.


    Rare that you fee the need for a cigarette after the usual Burger King value meal, but then this ain't your father's Whopper.  Wait, that came out wrong.  Whatever.

    [h/t The Consumerist]

    24 June 2009

    Shameless acts call for shameless measures: Governor Sanford Edition

    This Mark Sanford scandal has been breathtaking to watch. As scandals go, it has so much chunky goodness, it's like Christmas and a few birthdays rolled into one!  I mean, honestly, this gem is going to top the charts.

    The whole drama over Where's Waldo starts with the governor's security guys not being able to say where he is. 

    Then apparently inexperienced and annoying lieutenant governor gets annoyed.  The wife says she has no idea where he is (but actually knows way more than she let on).  The staff either lies or just repeats a lie about hiking on the Appalachian Trail, leaving them to look to be either complicit or clueless. 

    The Appalachian Trail story line gets funny as we find out Sunday was Naked Hiking Day and that the government stimulus plan Sanford fought so hard to turn away actually kicked money toward said Appalachian Trail. 

    Columbia SC newspapermen stake out the Atlanta airport.  Surprise!  "I was in Argentina!" 

    There's a tearful press conference, admission of guilt and claim of remorse and regret.  Apologize to nearly everyone everywhere.  Apologize some more.  And a bit more.  Then admit marital infidelity.  Whoops! 

    FOX News goes to battle stations, changing the chirons to indicate that Sanford is a Democrat, even though there is ample digital proof they (and nearly everyone) are well aware he is oh-so-Republican.

    Old emails leak out and go front page in the local paper, who had been sitting on them since December (!), reinforcing claims that local media and other pols knew of the hanky and the panky for a while.  Mrs. Sanford goes public.  A pillar in the holier-than-you-gays-sanctity-of-marriage movement had been kicked out by the missus two weeks ago.

    Whew! 

    I want in on the scandal!  The best I can do is to shamelessly rip off a really, really funny comment from Jed Lewison at DK, who apparently shamelessly nicked it from someone else:

    Subject: Inside word from Sanford

    It was a slight miscommunication between Sanford and his staff.  He told them he'd be "spiking some Argentina tail," and they thought he'd said, "hiking the Appalachian trail."  It was an honest mistake.  I think they handled it well...family values and all.

    At least I was able to scam the top comment on this post at DK and used it to say I was stealing it.

    And in these days of instant digital media, stuff like this is already hitting the Internets...

    Might as well keep borrowing, this time turning to Keith Olberman, who teamed with Lewis Black, to discuss the plausibility (or lack thereof) of the Appalachian Trail hiking cover story.

    Governor? May I call you Mark?  Let's face it, Mark:  you, sir, are fucked.  But you do have the heartfelt appreciation of Senator Ensign for taking the spotlight off him, and from Governor Palin for making her look kinda good, at least for a few days.

    23 June 2009

    Ed McMahon and Budweiser: I can never think of the former without also thinking of the latter.

    It says something about American culture when CNN Radio News leads a "special report" with the death of Ed McMahon.  But, fact is, anyone over 40 remembers Ed's "Heeeeeeere's Johnny!" introduction of Johnny Carson in the 30 years Ed served as the Tonight Show announcer.  And who could forget Star Search?

    For me, I think Budweiser.  When I worked on the Anheuser-Busch account in the 1980s, Ed would still make appearances at distributor conventions... and they loved him.  He was as popular as the Bud Girls, and you could tell he loved it.

    In previous decades, he was the Budweiser pitchman, earning him lots of jokes from Johnny about his drinking.  But Ed seemed to have a way with those spots, ever the pitchman.

    Another A-B pitchman, Frank Sinatra, joined Ed on occasion...

    Ed did, apparently, show up drunk for work at least once...

    God Speed, Ed McMahon.  Hiyo!

    20 June 2009

    Before you decide to get into an argument with Candice Dainty, beware: She's packing heat

    MeanOldMsDainyAndHerGunGun people really, really love their guns.  Why else would anyone insist AK-47s should be legal for, you know, sport?  The dubious interpretations of the Second Amendment -- the one about armed militias -- have bastardized a centuries-old provision going back to the days when everyone needed to be in the army and guns meant single shot muskets.

    I have to wonder about people like Ms. Candice Dainty (left, with her peacemaker) who think along these lines...

    "You make a store or a school or a bank a no-gun zone, you make it a prime target for somebody who wants to shoot the place up," says Sauk City gun advocate Candace Dainty.

    Dainty, statewide organizer for the national group Second Amendment Sisters, is outspoken in her belief that guns -- carried in the open or concealed -- should be allowed anywhere: schools, public buildings, hospitals. Earlier this year, she tried to organize a rally to take place on June 16 on the grounds of the State Capitol. She scrubbed the plan, ironically, because she was afraid of who might show up with a gun. Reading an online forum on OpenCarry.org, she came upon discussions among several people who planned to show up with long guns, which would have taken the event in an unintended direction, she says.

    "In every whole group, you're going to have a nut case or two," she says. "And my rally drew out the nut cases."  
    [photo: Todd Krysiak/Sauk Prairie Eagle]


    Yes, ma'am.  Although when it comes to head-cases with guns, there are a lot more of them than one or two that may show up at your rally.  All the more reason to NOT arm everyone.  And those responsible for local public safety seem to think guns are not the answer to increased violence...

    Repealing either prohibition is a bad idea, according to Dane County Sheriff Dave Mahoney.

    While acknowledging an advisory opinion by state Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen in April that citizens should not be sanctioned for carrying guns in public, Mahoney says, "I think we need to adhere to some exceptions."

    He says he doesn't want schools to be put in harm's way, and he doesn't want his officers wondering if every driver they pull over has access to a gun.

    And the argument that more guns equals less crime? He fears that deterring crime by citizen gunfire is a recipe for disaster.  "I don't know that we want the streets of Madison to be the OK Corral," he says.

    Madison Mayor Dave Cieslewicz -- contending with heightened neighborhood unease in the wake of a 17-year-old high school student being gunned down on the city's southwest side two weeks ago, and the murder last week of a 23-year-old Madison man in nearby Fitchburg -- agrees.  "I don't think the answer to gun violence is more guns," he says. [Capital Times]

    How'd things work out with an armed citizen just this week?

    CrazyAssLucas According to the warrant, Sharmarisa A. Hammonds, 21, told police she went to [Perry E.] Lucas’ apartment at 3309 Leopold Way with her boyfriend, Detarius Martin, along with Martin’s brother and a woman identified by [Fitchburg Police Lt. Todd] Stetzer as Danyelle Dalbec, who was Lucas’ former girlfriend.

    After an argument broke out between a man and woman in the apartment, she and the Martin brothers walked away with Hammonds in the lead. She said she saw Lucas standing in the doorway with a handgun and got out of the hall. Within seconds she heard gunshots, the warrant states, and Chukarius and Detarius Martin ran to her saying they had been shot.

    In a phone call to 911, the warrant states, Lucas told a dispatcher that he had taken out a gun and shot some people who had come to his apartment and “attacked me.”

    But Stetzer said the contact between the people in the apartment had ended and they were walking away when Lucas came out of the apartment and fired at them. [Wisconsin State Journal]

    The article points out that under a search warrant, police removed items including an assault rifle, vials of testosterone and anger management materials from the shooter's residence.  This from a guy who, from police reports, allegedly shot his victims as they were walking away.  So his gun didn't head off violence; it created it.  Even if the other guys had been carrying guns, this jerk seems to have shot them, at least figuratively, in the back.  The altercation appeared to have ended, but the coward with the gun shoots people as they walk away.  How in the hell would more armed people not resulted in more people getting shot?

    In fairness, this is still under investigation, the shooter is an Iraqi war veteran, and reportedly has PTSD.  And guns.  He had guns.  As the sheriff said, talk about a recipe for disaster. 

    Meanwhile, Ms. Dainty -- who ironically, in that picture with her hand-held cannon, looks anything but dainty -- things guns should be everywhere.  In church.  In schools.  In the Pick 'n' Save.  At McDonald's.  On the front seat of your car while you motor down the highway.  At your mom's funeral.  In the mall.  Sitting behind you in the movies.  I'd be feeling safer already just thinking about it... if I was batshit crazy.

    Everyone carries guns everywhere.  I'm sorry, but that's fucked up.

    The Nerd versus Jock Test: John Hodgman examines President Obama at the Radio and TV Correspondents' Dinner

    There's a lot more to John Hodgman than just his portrayal of PC on the Apple commercials.  He's a very funny writer and performer, as demonstrated by his appearance last night at the Radio and TV Correspondents dinner in Washington along side the President.  It's worth the 14 minutes of viewing time, especially if you're a nerd.

    If you like his stuff, get a copy of his book, The Areas of my Expertise.  This is one book that is truly better as an audio book, as his delivery is as much fun as the words themselves.

    18 June 2009

    Apparently, FOX News considers it a major news event for the President to swat a fly on (low-rated) national television

    Foxattacksfly2 Honestly, the people at FOX News must want people to make fun of them.  I mean, really?  You have so warped a perspective on what's important, and so little regard for this President, that you proclaim his swatting of a fly "Breaking News" on your web site.  (This is a screen capture from 4:56 ET this morning.)

    Of course, aligning with PETA for the "no kill" fly catcher is just icing on the asshat cake.

    [h/t Jed at DK]

    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 03/2007
    My Photo

    Your email address:


    Powered by FeedBlitz

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Newsvine media News