Like him or not, George Will is a damn good writer in terms of the technical craft of op-ed journalism. The man is articulate and well-spoken, and he knows how to translate his thoughts beautifully into print. I've met him on several occasions, had lunch with him once, and even had a few beers with him at a Cubs game. He's actually a pretty nice guy. Nonetheless, I tend to disagree with him most of the time.
That said, Will made clear a couple points about the current embrace of "teh stupid" in his Washington Post column today.
First, with regard to the possibility of a Sarah Palin candidacy...
Barry Goldwater, whose seat John McCain occupies, chose to run with
Bill Miller, a congressman from Lockport, N.Y., near Buffalo. Miller,
Goldwater cheerfully explained, annoyed Lyndon Johnson. After the
Goldwater-Miller ticket lost 44 states, Miller retired to Lockport,
where he practiced law and lived in dignified anonymity until his death
in 1983. Although he had served as an assistant prosecutor of Nazi war
criminals at Nuremberg and spent seven terms in Congress, no one
suggested he should be considered for the 1968 Republican presidential
nomination.
Yet Sarah Palin, who with 17 months remaining in her single term as
Alaska's governor quit the only serious office she has ever held, is
obsessively discussed as a possible candidate in 2012. Why? She is not
going to be president and will not be the Republican nominee unless the
party wants to lose at least 44 states.
And on the rise of anti-intellectualism these days that seems to be actually chasing away smart people from the Republican core...
America, its luck exhausted, at last has a president from the academic
culture, that grating blend of knowingness and unrealism. But the
reaction against this must somewhat please him. That reaction is
populism, a celebration of intellectual ordinariness. This is not a
stance that will strengthen the Republican Party, which recently has
become ruinously weak among highly educated whites. Besides,
full-throated populism has not won a national election in 178 years,
since Andrew Jackson was reelected in 1832.
Remember when people said they liked George W. Bush because he seemed like a guy you'd enjoy having a beer with? Bush did a great job of masking his Ivy-league, silver spoon upbringing so as to appear to be a man of the common folk. Brilliant marketing. (It helped, of course, that he truly wasn't the brightest bulb on the Bush family tree, to be sure.) That was actually a leading item the criteria some people used to consider him worthy of the highest office in our nation and, arguably, in the world.
Sadly, that explains a lot about the whole Sarah Palin thing. But it makes me wonder. Do these same people want to go to a doctor who they know finished last in his class at an off-shore, unaccredited medical school? Do they want a person flying their American Airline jet who learned to fly on an X-Box? I mean, really, what's up with that? Why would you want an intellectual lightweight with little real experience (and who quit her only real political office half-way through to go on the talk-for-money circuit) to be President of the United States?
Back again to H. L. Mencken... "No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." Or their intelligence, it seems.
[h/t to DemFromCT at DK for pointing me to the column.]